Anyone who
has done a lot of shipwreck research knows that there are just some wrecks
that, as my late dad used to say, “Stick in yer’ craw.” Frankly I prefer to say
that they haunt you. Indeed I have several- they are the wrecks that you simply
cannot find enough information on or what information there is happens to be
conflicting in one way of another. This little tale is about a little enigma by
the name of GARDEN CITY.
Click HERE to see the book |
I first came
across the GARDEN CITY while writing the story of her fleet mate and near
sister OSWEGATCHIE. The GARDEN CITY stuck with me, although I had enough
information to write a whole chapter about the OSWEGATCHIE in one of my early and
now out of print books. (I resurrected it my book “The Best of Wes”, I
despise that title, by the way… it was the publisher’s idea and they refused to
change it. But it has some of my favorite work in it and it still sells, so my
wife won’t let me complain… around her anyway.)
GARDEN CITY
was a former passenger and roll-on cargo vessel on Lake Ontario that found
herself, like her sister, hedged into obsolescence by the expanding railroads
and the coming of larger vessels. Built in 1873 for the Northern Transit
Company she was one a fleet of just over a dozen nearly identical 135 foot long
steam propellers. They were deliberately constructed to fit the locks of the
old Welland Canal.
Just a few years after her construction, however the N.T. line fell on rude financial times. On December 29, 1875 it was announced that the entire fleet would be sold at an Assignee’s sale. That sale for the GARDEN CITY and her fleet mates MAINE and CHAMPLAIN took place where they were last laid up, Toledo, Ohio on January 6, 1876. By 1879 the GARDEN CITY was owned by Frank Gilchrist. His objective was simple; cash in on Michigan’s booming lumber industry. With that in mind the boat was taken to Alpena and cut down to a lumber hooker. Here mid cabins were removed and her sides cut lower to facilitate the hand-loading and unloading of the lumber shovers. She went promptly into hauling board feet of fresh timber.
Early photo of the GARDEN CITY. Note the passengers on the bow. In the 1870s a steamship trip was a big deal. |
Just a few years after her construction, however the N.T. line fell on rude financial times. On December 29, 1875 it was announced that the entire fleet would be sold at an Assignee’s sale. That sale for the GARDEN CITY and her fleet mates MAINE and CHAMPLAIN took place where they were last laid up, Toledo, Ohio on January 6, 1876. By 1879 the GARDEN CITY was owned by Frank Gilchrist. His objective was simple; cash in on Michigan’s booming lumber industry. With that in mind the boat was taken to Alpena and cut down to a lumber hooker. Here mid cabins were removed and her sides cut lower to facilitate the hand-loading and unloading of the lumber shovers. She went promptly into hauling board feet of fresh timber.
Seen here at the Soo, the GARDEN CITY is heavily loaded with a bulk cargo of some sort. Boland used her for iron ore and for coal as well as lumber. |
GARDEN CITY
went about her business until in the spring of 1897. She was moored for the
night at Alpena, Michigan when the trouble began. Everyone aboard was asleep at
3am as a fire broke out between her smoke stack and its surrounding timbers.
The fire was extinguished, but not before it consumed her aft quarters and
engine room. The boat’s machinery was saved, but her aft section had to be
completely rebuilt at a cost of $3,000. She was uninsured and thus ended up
being sold in 1898 to John J. Boland.
On Friday
evening, October 10, 1902 she had just finished unloading a lumber cargo at Bay
City, Michigan and was heading to Saginaw for winter lay-up. She again caught
fire and this time she burned to the water’s edge.
And that
folks… is where the information ends.
You cannot
find a mention of her in any of the local news papers. Of course it doesn’t
help that the Bay City Times apparently had no one doing “Marine Matters” in
that time. To make the matter worse she burned late on a Friday and in that era
of hand-set type newspapers most of Saturday’s paper was already composed and
laid out by late Friday evening and pretty much all of the Sunday papers were
fluff pieces done in advance, so the paper’s staff could have the weekend off.
So the story of a burned lumber hooker in the river minus any fatalities was
easily overlooked. What news items are in the marine columns of other papers of
the era are either exceptionally brief or have some conflicting details. Some reports
that have been passed along to us as history say she burned, “…on Saginaw Bay,
three miles south of Bay City.” Which is really hard to do since Saginaw Bay is
located four miles north of Bay City. Odds are that published error began with
an October 15, 1906 Detroit Free Press drama article about the bad luck of the
N-T fleet. Most more reliable articles say that she burned south of Bay City,
but the distances are stated either as three miles or four miles south.
This wreck quietly
nagged at me for quite a while. Of course what often happens is the answer pops
up when you’re not looking for what you once were really looking for. In the
case of the GARDEN CITY I was looking for a totally different wreck along the
Saginaw River and had gotten a CD or aerial photos from the US Geological
Survey. The set that I requested was from October 29, 1965 and runs the entire
length of the river.
These photos come in a .TIFF format and are high resolution. While examining one of the frames, just at the southern tip of Bay City’s “Middle Grounds” I spotted a well defined outline of a vessel! The water, although highly murky, was apparently quite low at the time of the photos. An earlier 1954 USGS image of the same area does not show her at all, yet a partially sunken scow barge nearby is clearly visible.
Frame from a U.S. Geological Survey run. The original .TIFF is a far higher resolution than Blogger will allow me to display in this post. |
These photos come in a .TIFF format and are high resolution. While examining one of the frames, just at the southern tip of Bay City’s “Middle Grounds” I spotted a well defined outline of a vessel! The water, although highly murky, was apparently quite low at the time of the photos. An earlier 1954 USGS image of the same area does not show her at all, yet a partially sunken scow barge nearby is clearly visible.
Here is the interesting portion of the USGS frame. |
And right here is what caught my eye. |
Using Google
Earth I measured the location to be about 3.6 miles south of the city limits as
they would have been in 1902.
The arrow shows the distinct outline of a sunken vessel. Note: Just to the left of the sunken vessel is a sunken work scow that shows up as a tark rectangle. |
But, was
this the GARDEN CITY or was it one of the two tugs that had sunk in the same
general area? How do you measure its length from a USGS photo? There is no real
exacting scale on the image. But there is one certain landmark in the image
that can be measured.
In the lower left we see the end of Runway 5 at James Clements Airport. It made for a handy yardstick. |
In the lower
left of the image is James Clements Airport. Runway 5 on that airfield is
exactly 75 feet wide. Zooming in on it I imposed a digital arrow across the
runway. That gave me a 75 foot long measuring stick. By transposing that onto
the wreck in the same image I was able to estimate it’s length at between 130
and 140 feet. The length of the GARDEN CITY was 135 feet.
Here the ~75 foot measuring arrow is superimposed on the wreck... |
... the remaining distance, shown by the dotted line is about 55 feet. That would make the length of the wreck in the neighborhood of 135 feet. |
Of course,
just one measurement isn’t good enough… at least not for me. So I did a bit
more searching. On Google Earth’s 2014 view of the same area you can just
barely make out the wreck.
One side of the outline can be seen and, most importantly, a small portion of her keel can also be made out. Using Google Earth’s measuring stick, which I know is not hugely precise, I set two lines, one for the keel segment and one for the beam segment and measured between them. The distance, which would equate to ½ of her overall beam was approximately 12 feet. The overall beam of the GARDEN CITY is listed as 26 feet.
This image shows us the 2014 remains. Note the beams and the dot where the keel should be. This may very well be her rudder post as they often remain standing. |
One side of the outline can be seen and, most importantly, a small portion of her keel can also be made out. Using Google Earth’s measuring stick, which I know is not hugely precise, I set two lines, one for the keel segment and one for the beam segment and measured between them. The distance, which would equate to ½ of her overall beam was approximately 12 feet. The overall beam of the GARDEN CITY is listed as 26 feet.
Now, none of us can ever be 100% sure and put a name onto a river wreck like this without a definitive photo
showing her name or a name board itself. That said, the other tugs lost in this
area are the KATY REID, which was identified by me as being well inside the
north channel of the Middle Grounds and the L.G. MASON. Which is listed as only
being only 122 feet in length. Thus both are disqualified.
In my
opinion, this is the GARDEN CITY.
And now it's time for shameless self promotion...
If you like my writing, try my books! Those that are
still in print can be gotten HERE directly from me.
In fact I'll autograph and personalize them for you,
or for whoever you wish. My prices are the same
as my publisher, or Amazon- but you'll be
dealing directly with me, the author!
No comments:
Post a Comment